
21st International Lab Meeting – Winter Session 2013
of the
European/International Joint Ph.D. in Social Representations and Communication
SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME
Meta-Theoretical Analysis of the Social Representations Literature
&
Advanced Training in Complementary Transferable Skills
(writing skills and publishing strategies)
at the European/International Joint PhD in Social Representations & Communication Research Center and Multimedia LAB
Piazza Cavalieri di Malta 2, Rome - Italy
14-15 January 2013
| Day | Time | Topic/Events | Teaching Staff & Research Assistant | 
|---|---|---|---|
| January 14 Monday | Morning 10:00-10:30 | Basic Guidelines for the Meta-Theoretical Analysis of the Literature on Social Representations Key Lecture: "State of the Art of the Meta-Theoretical Analysis of the Social Representations Literature" Session reserved to European Ph.D. Research Trainees | 
 Prof. Annamaria de Rosa Scientific Co-ordinator of the European Ph.D. on S.R. & C. Italy 
 Dr. Laura Dryjanska European Ph.D. on S.R. & C. Italy | 
| 10:30-13:30 | Group Training on the Meta-Theoretical Analysis of Social Representations Literature Session reserved to European Ph.D. Research Trainees | 
 Prof. Annamaria de Rosa Scientific Co-ordinator of the European Ph.D. on S.R. & C. Italy 
 Dr. Laura Dryjanska European Ph.D. on S.R. & C. Italy 
 Active participation by the European PhD Research Trainees | 
| Day | Time | Topic/Events | 
|---|---|---|
| January 15 Tuesday | Morning 10:00-12:00 | Seminar and Group Discussion on "Writing skills and publishing policies: increasing the odds of getting published in the current scenario" 
 Introduced by Prof. Annamaria de Rosa  "For a multi-format publishing: aims, guidelines and editorial constraints" 
 with the contributions of Prof. Bruno Mazzara "The current debate about metrics and non-metrics approaches to the evaluation of scientific products" 
 Prof. Mauro Sarrica "Bibliometric tools: when, why and how do you use them" 
 Prof. Francesca Emiliani & Prof. Giovanna Leone "Critical remarks on the controversial debate about the evaluation of the scientific quality and publishing strategies" | 
