Selection of related Ivana Markova’s articles:
Markova, I. (2003a). Social representations: old and new. In I. Markova (Ed), Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind (pp. 118-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markova, I. (2003b). Dialogical triads and three-component processes. In I. Markova (Ed), Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind (pp. 147-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Markova, I. (2003c). Les focus groups. In S. Moscovici, F. Buschini (Eds), Les methods des Sciences Humaines (pp. 221-242). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Selection of related Nikos Kalampalikis’ articles:
Orfali, B., Markova, I. (2002). Analogies in focus group: from the victim to the murderer and from the murderer to the victim. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52 (3-4), 263-271.
Kalampalikis, N., Buschini, F. (2002a). The Prospero Software program: An alternative tool for the study of Social Representation. European Review of Applied Psychology, 52 (3-4), 24l-251.
Kalampalikis, N. (2002b). La synonymie, l’analogie et la taxinomie: trios formes de categorization pour l’etude des representations socials. Garnier, C., & Doise, W. (Eds.), Les representationes Sociales. Montreal: Editions nouvelles.
Bibliographic references on Focus-Group, Discursive Psychology and empirical research on Social Representations:
Collins, S. & Markovà, I. (2004). Collaborative statements: New method in the study of data issued from focus groups/Les énoncés collaboratifs: Nouvelle méthode dans l'étude des données issues de focus groups. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57 (3), 291-298.
Cvetkovich, G. T. & Winter, P. L. (2003). Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environment and Behavior, 35 (2), 286-307.
de Oliveira, D. C., de Sá, C. P., Fischer, F. M., Martins, I. S. & Teixeira, L. R. (2001). Future and freedom: The work and the school institution in the social representations of adolescents/Futuro e liberdade: O trabalho e a instituição escolar nas representações sociais de adolescentes. Estudos de Psicologia, 6 (2), 245-258.
de Rosa, A.S. (2006) The boomerang effect of radicalism in Discursive Psychology: A critical overview of the controversy with the Social Representations Theory. Journal for the theory of Social Behaviour, 36 (2), pp. 161-201.
Jaffre, Y. & Prual, A. (1994). Midwives in niger: An uncomfortable position between social behaviours and health care constraints. Social science & medicine, 38 (8), 1069-1073.
Jovchelovitch, S. & Zittoun, T. (2004). Contextualizing focus groups: Understanding the groups and the cultures within research about representations/Contextualiser les focus groups: Comprendre les groupes et les cultures dans la recherche sur les représentations. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57 (3), 245-252.
Kalampalikis, N. (2004). Focus groups, anchoring places/Les focus groups, lieux d'ancrages. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57 (3), 281-289.
Kitzinger, J., Kalampalikis, N. & Orfali, B. (2004). The sand in the oyster: Analyzing focus group discussions/Le sable dans l'huître: Analyser des discussions de focus group. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57 (3), 299-307.
Kruger, R.A., Casey, M.A. (2000). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE publication: London.
Lloyd, B., Lucas, K. & Fernbach, M. (1997). Adolescent girls' constructions of smoking identities: Implications for health promotion. Journal of adolescence, 20 (1), 43-56.
Moloney, G. & Walker, I. (2002). Talking about transplants: Social representations and the dialectical, dilemmatic nature of organ donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41 (2), 299-320.